How to tame a dragon: Kung Fu Panda Edition

We reached the third part of the cartoon about Adventures rollering of an absolutely impartial spherical body of a monochrome color to places Not so Distant. And despite the fact that the opportunity to admire the immense open spaces of ancient animal China as a whole, and the equally immense expanses of some of its inhabitants in particular, were provided a week ago, according to my modest unconstructive sample, not everyone got acquainted, have seen enough, hung up.

If possible, trying to avoid the bestial, in every sense, spoilers, it must be said that the third part of the franchise continues the glorious tradition of the praise of universal harmony, love, friendship and body positive, as well as regular mass Ddos-enacts of the viewer with a frozen action action in the style of early Jackie Chan, only with an amplitude. In other words, there is nothing special to spoil, since the linear logic and no less linear trailer and so quite clearly give the direction of understanding who, where, whom and why and why.
The only thing that can be thrown into the masses (however, perhaps curd) for the seed - the trailer looks much less interesting and colorful than the film itself - this is the very opposite to the “minions” the moment when they did not chop into advertising the most tidbing fragments and the picture, without provoking high expectations, there is something to show something.

So stands or stands at a distance?

Yes, in general, a message about identity and self -determination is a good, eternal, correct, fundamental, questioning, questioning “where is my big spoon?"And the background regime eats the consciousness of any less or less thought process. And, it seems, even sinful and I do not want to send this business to the blue minus corner of the ring, but, Houston, I can’t cope with me, and they still have not been brought to now ..

This is the third film that uses exactly the same scheme, exactly the same message and almost exactly the same jokes.

Act is the first.
Actors: self -determination, prehren issues, acceptance.
Act of the second.
Actors: the same, only in profile.
Act is third.
Actors: the same, questions came out.

And the final conclusion, the conclusion, which, https://telbetcasino.co.uk/ is the Most Holy Daggeries!, - with lightning speed solves all the problems, just usually of a local - Everything is secondary, orchestra, mazurka! accept your status, regardless of the opinions of others, your own opinion and circumstances.

And it seems to be nothing, but all films have the same target thought, almost the same path to it and the same result, all the shades of which, (there could be your joke for 50), are present in each part or another or another. All shades. In each part.
Is it good? Well, in principle, yes, the repetition is the mother of the teaching, the material must be fixed, but the measure, the measure that you will drink the hell, is already almost an idea ..

Therefore, answering the question posed, is worth it, but very close to the edge.

All this post I do not want to scare away the population from the film, on the contrary - at the moment the trilogy is remarkable, aiming in the right side of the world, gave rise to a wonderful series for those who have not been given, leaves the door open throughout the brain, because enthusiasm is energetically generated by budding and prencishes from everywhere, where it is not locked.
Those who have not yet found the strength/time/money to familiarize themselves with the Kun-Fu Panda 3, I still recommend doing this and do this nevertheless in the cinema-with a correctly selected session and the absence of a champing emboss, Harmony and inner peace Guaranteed and provided. Without registration and SMS.

Where are we going?

All this has only one, a sad visible future, the fact is the promise of the chief director of the DreamWorks studio, which in the case of a successful flight of a third part, the franchise is planned ahead for at least 3 full -lengths.
“Everything is in moderation,” said Nera, ".
However, time will tell.

The best comments

Quite a solid review. True, he went over a stick with jokes-tires or what to call them there. In general, hesitated.
And yes, I convinced me to look at home when it comes out in XD quality: 3

There were not enough glasses on the perk of the perk

Well, about the degree of atmosphere of the large screen, I warned x)

The style is obscene. In some ways, Bykova recalls in his best years, but with his tomatoes, for which here is direct respect. 🙂

For nothing, that the text is about panda (because well, with all my respect, well, here ... something somehow. ), everything is read in one breath. Write Ischo.

Yesterday I checked this cartoon, after a sufficiently long impression of a bunch of reviews in the spirit of “Cool cartoon!", And keeping in his heart clearly positive memories of the first two parts.

But this one was not impressed at all, well. That is, yes, it is both beautiful, and bright, and kind - but it is absolutely monotonous. That is, upon exiting the cinema, I immediately realized what the problem was - the characters of all the characters by the end of the story are absolutely the same as by its beginning. That is, it is a cartoon that formally stomps in one place.
I could accept an excuse that we were revealed the characters - but they were already revealed in the past two parts. No one was new, formally, it was added, with the exception of several template pands, many of which are generally not pronounced at all! That is, it seems like they did something new, but none of this new one looks claiming-but the carrier of the old is visible to the naked eye. And this immediately after developing the stormy imagination of the end of the second part. Then he sat, and thought: “Uuuu! Such a twist! It will be cool!". And yesterday I looked, and turned out to be "zilch".